Freemasons

How do Freemason’s really view the Bible? How will they use it to deceive in the end times?

3KK84W2.jpg#signsendtime How do Freemason’s really view the Bible? How will they use it to deceive Christians and non Christian alike in the end time?

“MAT 5.33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths: MAT 5.34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne: MAT 5.35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool : neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. MAT 5.36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. MAT 5.37 But let your communication be , Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.”

I have quoted in this commentary directly from the “Preface “of an initiate’s Masonic Bible. Brackets: [] used within the quote indicate my commentary or clarification.

The “Old Charges” were replaced on the Master’s pedestal by the printed Book of Constitutions. A half a century later, the “Book of Constitutions” was replaced by Holy Bible, called in Masonic nomenclature, the “Volume of the Sacred Law ”.

Freemasons overtly swear oaths for their obligations and loyalties, upon the Bible as a “legal instrument”, the written successor to the oral traditions “Old Charges”, all the while defying Biblical instructions regarding oaths and legalism.

Swearing oaths on Bibles spread to courts, public offices and elsewhere after the publication of the KJV Bible via Masonic sponsorship, promotion, and constitutive practice of their occult beliefs, as they dominated these “legal” institutions:

Expect this will be part of accepting the mark of the beast ceremony at the mid point of the last seven years, swearing an oath/covenant of loyalty and obligations to antichrist and Satan on the Bible, as part of the new “Sacred Law.”

“Before the Bible came into common use members and officers in a fraternity, gild, or society were required by law to take an oath, and in many instances the form of the oath was embodied in the charter; and in a borough of a sufficient size a collection of oaths was kept in an official oath book; in the early Masonic Lodges Candidates and affiliating members received oaths from the Old Lodges, a copy of which served as a legal instrument; but after the Bible came to be used to sanction oaths for public office and in the courts, it similarly came to replace the “Old Charges” for that purpose in the Lodges.”

Freemasons usurped the Bible to display on their altar and for their occult purposes; not to glorify God, while redefining the Bible with their own “definitions”, and “mysteries” to lead people away from God.

Thus they view the Bible as work of literature encoded with hidden secrets/mysteries; used as a occult legal book to bind its oaths and obligations.

In the last 7 years, and perhaps sooner, spurious forces will redefine the Bible as a “mystical work” only understood through allegorical interpretation through learning occult knowledge, thus unlocking the meaning hidden underneath the alleged superficial text:

“Masons did not write it [the Bible] and yet they use it as though they had because they employ it for purposes of their own and apply it to definitions peculiar to themselves [allegories]; as it lies on the Altar it is many things at once, is inwardly multiordinal, is filled with mysteries, and owns many meanings……and leaves each Mason to read and interpret it according to such light as he has”

“…the Lodge uses it [Bible] as the literature of religion; and yet though it is a book of religion it is at the same time for Masonry a legal book also, because it gives sanctions to Obligations’ [oaths]”

“The Fraternity leaves the Bible as a text-book of theology to the church, and the Bible as a work of history it leaves to the historians, and commits no member to any doctrine either of history or theology [except for Masonry’s redefined theology thereof]”

Freemasons selectively draft portions of the Bible for their specious objectives, but interpreted through the “Old Charges” as defined by the “Polychronicon”. They will present a “revised history” in the end time, relegating the Bible to a “fairy tale” encoded with secrets hidden the superficial text:

“The real bible of the Operative Lodges of the Middle Ages was a copy of the Old Charges; they are the Rosetta stone by means of which scholars are enabled to decipher the history of the Fraternity, about which was little known until the Nineteenth Century; and they continue to be the key to the mysteries, and symbolisms of the Ritual of the Three Degrees, in which are enacted in a somewhat unchanged and elaborated form what was first written down in those documents.”

“The author of the “Old Charges” drew his own data from such a polychronicon; we know this to be true because he told us so.” This means that his paragraphs about Noah, Cain, Abel, TubalCain, the Tower of Babel, David, Solomon, and the Temple, were copied not from the Bible but from the polychronicon.”

Hence, Freemasons, as do Jesuits, re-interpret the Bible through allegories, their own spurious history, and through the Seven Sacred Sciences that manifested secret societies and Mystical religions begat by Enoch son of Cain.

“The story that work was a curse upon Adam and Eve was an old Oriental pessimistic tale so soon forgotten that in the next chapters after it [Enoch son of Cain and his progeny] the writers of the books glorified the men who worked great things for their people, built cities, and found the arts”

“Two pillars represented the pillars in which the secrets of the Liberal Arts and Sciences were preserved through Noah’s flood. An ark represented the flood.”

Hence, the Bible is relegated to a fairy tale as Tolkien and Lewis conveyed: fairy-stories were meaningful but not real; history was real but not meaningful; that the “mysteries” in the Bible were encoded below the superficial text.

In Tolien’s essay in “On Fairy Stories,” published in a book Lewis edited:

“The Gospels contain a fairy-story, or a short story of a larger kind which embraces all the essence of fairy-stories. They contain many marvels—peculiarly artistic, beautiful, and moving: “mystical” in their perfect, self-contained significance; and among the marvels is the greatest and most complete conceivable eucatastrophe. But this story has entered the primary world; the desire and aspiration of sub creation has been raised to the fulfillment of Creation. The Birth of Christ is the eucatastrophe of Man’s history.”

To this end, Freemasonry notes:

‘It [the Bible] is the text-book of the Christian and Jewish religions yet the Lodge does not use it as a text-book because the Lodge is not a church and has no theology—the Lodge uses it as the literature of religion; and yet though it is a book of religion it is at the same time for Masonry a legal book also, because it gives sanctions to Obligations’ [and/or oaths].

“The Bible… at the same time represents each of the world Bibles, and maybe replaced by the the Koran, the Zend Avesta, the Veda’s etc”

In the end time, the Bible will be usurped; redefined and deployed its new allegoric form, a fairy-story, with its newly discovered hidden mysteries to honour and worship Satan, who Masons call Lucifer: the Great Architect Of The Universe:

“The Book of Revelation is a New Testament book of eschatology and apocalyptics; it also belongs to the cycle of Scriptures upon which the Ritual draws, because it contains a picture of the New Jerusalem and its Temple, ‘whose builder and maker is God,’ which reminds the Mason that his own description of God as the Sovereign Grand Architect of the Universe is as old as the Bible even though the Bible nowhere uses those words.”

“‘In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth’ is composed of the first three verses of the first chapter of Genesis. The Hebrew word bara which is translated as “created” could have been more accurately translated as “made” or even as ‘built.”

Source: Gary Wayne